Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - NZ

G2I·New Zealandsenior$16,000–$32,000 USD/mo

In short

→Evalúas interacciones de IA con código como ingeniero de software senior.
→Juzgas el juicio técnico, razonamiento y calidad del pensamiento de la IA, no solo el código.
→Destaca por tu 'gusto' técnico: distinguir lo bueno de lo excelente en respuestas de IA.

Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above)

In ~1 minute you get: who interviews you, the likely questions answered from your CV, and your CV tailored to this job. Free, no card.

The questions they'll ask you

1. ¿Qué diferencias notarías entre una respuesta de IA con 'buen juicio ingenieril' y otra que solo es técnicamente correcta?

🔒 +7 more questions

No card. Upload your resume and the full dossier is ready in ~1 minute.

🎧Land the interview? Bring the copilot. Our free extension listens to the live interview and flashes 3-4-word anchors from your resume and prep — glance, connect, talk. Get the extension →

💵 USD · Remote · No visa

Not finding what you want? Try Micro1

Micro1 places engineers directly at US companies paying in USD. One vetting, multiple offers — no cold applying.

Get matched by Micro1 →

📬Jobs picked for YOUR resume, every morning on WhatsApp. Free: text “vacantes” and the bot sends your daily matches. Subscribe →

What they ask for

✓Experiencia senior, staff o principal como ingeniero de software.
✓Dominio de TypeScript/JavaScript o Python.
✓Experiencia práctica con OpenAI Codex, Claude Code o Cursor.
✓Familiaridad profunda con flujos de desarrollo asistidos por IA.
✓Capacidad para evaluar código sin ejecutarlo ni revisar línea por línea.
✓Inglés fuerte (B2+) para escribir y grabar retroalimentación.

Don't tick every box? That's normal — your free dossier shows your gaps and how to cover them in the interview.

OpenAI CodexClaude CodeCursorTypeScriptJavaScriptPythonLoomGitHubVS CodeAI-assisted dev workflows

Who should you write to at G2I?

Your free dossier identifies the people who'd interview you — their background, what they value, and how to reach out so you stand out before applying.

com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5 We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer. What this role actually is You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on: • Whether the response makes sense • Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful • Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment • Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part. What you'll be doing • Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end • Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think • Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code • Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4) • Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading • Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code What we mean by "taste" We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like: • Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say? • Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct? • Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output? • Would this interaction build or erode trust? You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly. Who you are • Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience) • Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python • Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor • Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows • Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line • Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). Nice to have • Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows • Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards Engagement details • Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location • Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible • Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well • Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat • Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough.

Looking for something similar?

Leave your email and we'll alert you when matching jobs appear.

Don't apply unprepared

We research who's interviewing you, tailor your CV and rehearse you live — first one free.